AJ Student Prize Nominees: Reece Murray from BA Architecture DS3.4 and Rebecca Kelly from MArch DS11

This year’s entries for the AJ Student Prize from the School of Architecture + Cities, University of Westminster were brilliant projects by Reece Murray from Year 3, BA Architecture, Design Studio 3.4 and Rebecca Kelly from MA Architecture, Design Studio 11.

“The AJ Student Prize celebrates the brilliant emerging talent of students graduating from undergraduate and postgraduate architecture courses across the UK.”

AJ
Student: Reece Murray
Studio: Architecture BA, RIBA Part I, DS3.4
Tutors: Paolo Zaide and Tom Budd

Cliffe Marsh – Developing the Periphery

Project Summary:

Cliffe Village, located on the periphery of London is a historically working town with a proportion of the Marsh located north of the site used for munitions production. This project is a community centre located on the periphery between Cliffe village and Cliffe marsh, offering a new approach to how we develop villages non-specific to London. This will be a critique on the proposed intentions for the new Cliffe residential, the project provides the means and opportunity for the residents to dictate the village they want to see.

The project is dictated and influenced by the history of Cliffe as well as its vernacular. I aim to provide the community the means and education for work relating to the construction of the new Cliffe, celebrating the mixture between community, circularity and craft:

  • Community: The client and funding for the project is Medway council, providing a better solution for the proposed 225 homes intended to be built in Cliffe woods. The centre aims to become the solutions for appropriately developing Cliffe, allowing the community to dictate the Cliffe they want to see.
  • Circularity: All materials are sourced locally reducing carbon emissions and embodiment in the construction processes. The materials used is the construction processes are intended to be recycled and renewed throughout their lifetime like the changing of the seasons.
  • Craft: Water reed is taken from Cliffe marsh being used as thatch, with Scots pine sourced from the surrounding site. Recycled steel is taken from the local industrial area with rammed earth made up of the soil taken from site excavations.

This project invites us to pause and question the sensitivity needed when developing areas found on the periphery of London.

Tutors’ statement:

‘There was the red sun, on the low level of the shore, in a purple haze, fast deepening into black; and there was the solitary flat marsh; and far away there were the rising grounds, between which and us there seemed to be no life, save here and there in the foreground a melancholy gull.’

Charles Dickens

Reece’s project to develop a local Kentish village can be read as a graphic novel. Viewed as a continuous scroll rather than as individual images, his delicate models and drawings capture the ‘dark flat wilderness’ of the Hoo peninsula, at the very edge of the Thames Estuary described in Charles Dickens’ Great Expectations.

His proposal is to work with the heritage of Cliffe Village, imagining incremental ways of expanding the community within this unique landscape. This reflects his deep concern for what has been there before, to learn from the local vernacular and to interpret these findings into a contemporary context. Growing the village over time allows Cliffe to re-frame specific fragments of the landscape, atmosphere and culture of this distinct setting.

There is something quiet, caring and personal in this work – it is humble, light in touch and reflects a sensitivity that is rare for a young designer.

Studio Brief Title: Peripheral Landscapes: Reimagining the edges of the Thames Gateway

The UK Government has marked the edges of the Thames Estuary as ground for regeneration and further urbanisation. Connecting the point of Westferry in East London to the Isle of Sheppey and the pier of Southend, this 70 kilometer stretch has also been described as the Thames Gateway. Once home to many hard and commercial industries these lands are characterised by a lack of access to public transport, services and employment, whilst at the same time, the surrounding farm and wild salt marshlands host some of the country’s most fragile ecologies. With tidal flows continuously shifting this landscape, what is this a ‘Gateway’ to? This year Studio 4 explored these peri-urban and the blurred edges of the River Thames. From Gravesend out towards the Hoo Peninsula at the very edge of the Thames Estuary, the story of the river was mapped – its heritage and the unique landscape features that make up this ‘dark flat wilderness’. We challenged traditional notions of boundaries and explored analogue and digital Landscape Urbanism Strategies to plot, adapt and reimagine these unknown fields. The Studio welcomed projects with character, risk and a wonderful sense of speculation.

Student: Rebecca Kelly
Studio: MA Architecture, RIBA Part II, DS11
Tutors: Elantha Evans and Dusan Decermic

The Rig : Towards a New Biome

Project summary:

It’s 2050. Climate Change is Happening. The Rig exists in a future where civilisation is facing the eventuality that the climate crisis has overridden our attempts to restrain a habitual resource-intensive mode of operation. With just a 10m rise in sea level, Yorkshire’s economic extensive, rich, agricultural land – is underwater. Innovative ways of how we inhabit and use its resources must undergo a paradigm shift.

There has been a loss of 4.1 acres of agricultural land and 3.2 acres of residential land from a total of 9 acres in Hornsea. Yorkshire must devise new methods of rehousing, replanting and resupplying. THE FARM (Future-Flooding Alternative Regeneration Microcosm) is an overall design scheme that proposes a cellular regeneration model to address the issues of future-flooding in the Hornsea area caused by climate change.

The concept is based on reversing the roles of land and water, challenging the dichotomous relationship to support life’s survival in the eventuality of farmlands near the coast, rivers and lakes being flooded due to consequence of unchecked climate change. Similarly, housing will be significantly impacted, resulting in the forced relocation of settlements on the current uphill farmland. This will also necessitate alternative agricultural production and cattle breeding methods.

The Rig is an exploratory and propositional response to this call. Providing a new framework for living and farming with minimal environmental impact, it grows and manufactures alternative food sources and other agricultural by-products in abundance using a pixel farming logic not only by approaching farming in a new light but also building, a no waste policy for living. The Rig in the Mere is a prototype of an architectural typology to create green jobs, build a resilient economy, achieve net zero carbon and work with nature to invest in our future.

Tutors’ statement:

Futuristic and visionary, imagined in a world significantly changed, yet only thirty years from now. Hornsea Mere in North Yorkshire was identified and chosen by Rebecca (with her master-planning studio-partner Lavinia Pennino) as a laboratory within which to explore and develop specific, tangible, humane and architectural responses to the devastation that the climate crisis is imminently going to have on our coastal regions. Whilst convincing as designed for Yorkshire, ‘The Rig’ can expand, be multiplied, and located anywhere on our retreating coastline, with its composition (orientation and programme) able to adjust to specific socio-economic and environmental conditions as demanded. Both site-specific and universally applicable to this real-life contemporary concern, the project and Rebecca’s approach to design are ambitious, fearless, and rigorous. Her deep concern for the future of the human condition in the world we are mercilessly depleting of its resources, is expressed here by presenting a new way of living; with the possibility of intelligent cultivation, a new symbiotic relationship with the ‘land’ as ‘water’ and a self-sustaining progressive and productive attitude to the making of the ‘buildings’ themselves, their materiality and longevity.

Studio Brief Title: Northern Soul Productions

In the midst of a world-wide, 4th (technological) ‘revolution’, the ‘climate crisis’, what was a seemingly endemic ‘pandemic’ and the necessity to embrace new ways of living (outside the EU)… DS11, went NORTH… big challenges, fundamental questions… together we considered how a repositioning of the territories, towns, trade and turmoil in the North of England, might serve as an imaginative context for developing new understandings and visions for future human life and inhabitations. Guided by Elantha Evans and Dusan Decermic, the studio is conceived as a supportive, open-minded, self-reflexive and critical framework. By negotiating design ambitions at large geographical or urban scales and their implications as architecture and as inhabited spaces, projects carefully explore the relationships between abstracted urban / rural genetics and unearth unexpected possibilities for material rendering of space. Relevant, sensitive and emotive programmes are developed by each student in response to the contextual, socio economic and political concerns exposed through careful collaborative study and reflection by the studio.

ArCCAT Climate Action Week: What about ‘the other half’ of the ‘UN sustainability goals’? | Monday, October 25 at 13:00, M523

When: Monday, 25th of October 2021 at 1pm

Where: M523, Marylebone Campus

UoW students-as-co-creators project team 2021: Dana Al Khammach, Elantha Evans, Rebecca Kelly, James Mason and Lavinia Peninno.

Join us for a curated, interactive and enjoyable 15-20 min session at 13:00 on Monday 25th October 2021. This is about what YOU think we can do together, and is part of a wider project about architecture, empathy and the empathic imagination. Come along! And sign up here for more info on the project and future collaborations.

Offered as part of ‘Sustainable Disclosures’ // Expanding architecture education to better nurture people, places and practices for sustainable, inclusive futures (http://eepurl.com/hFy9q1).

ArCCAT Climate Action Week – Monday 25th to Friday 29th of October

The Architecture and Cities Climate Action Taskforce (ArCCAT) has developed an exciting, slightly-longer-than-a-week programme of events between October 18th and October 28th to support the University’s Sustainability Month, a lead-in to COP 26 in Glasgow at the beginning of November.

Go here for further details of the University’s programme: here: https://www.westminster.ac.uk/about-us/our-university/vision-mission-and-values/sustainability-month. 

The ArCCAT programme is as follows: 

Monday 18 October 18.30 – 19.30

Cartographies of the Monsoon Exhibition Opening

Venue: Gallery Café, 309 Regents Street, W1B 2HW

Lindsay Bremner in conversation with Tom Corby, Associate Dean of Research, Central St Martins.

This exhibition will show a selection of the maps produced by John Cook for Monsoon Assemblages, a research project in the School of Architecture and Cities at the University of Westminster funded by the European Research Council between 2016-2021. The project drew on the environmental humanities, the natural sciences and the spatial disciplines to develop an understanding of the entanglements of the monsoon in everyday life, politics and planning in Chennai, Delhi, Dhaka and Yangon, four of South Asia’s rapidly growing cities. The maps were mechanisms through which the project team constructed understandings of the materiality of the monsoon and the many mechanisms that drive it.

Monday 25 October 12.30 – 14.30 

What about ‘the other half’ of the ‘UN sustainability goals’?

Venue: Studio

UoW students-as-co-creators project team 2021: Dana Al Khammach, Elantha Evans, Rebecca Kelly, James Mason and Lavinia Peninno.

Join us for a curated, interactive and enjoyable 15-20 min session anytime between 12.30-14.30 on Monday 25th October 2021. This is about what YOU think we can do together, and is part of a wider project about architecture, empathy and the empathic imagination. Come along! And sign up here for more info on the project and future collaborations.

Offered as part of ‘Sustainable Disclosures’ // Expanding architecture education to better nurture people, places and practices for sustainable, inclusive futures (http://eepurl.com/hFy9q1).

Monday 25 October 13.00 

Launch of Design Competition for a material reuse station for the studios

Venue: Studio

Doiny Kypraiou, Stefania Bocoletti, Paolo Zaide and Tabatha Mills.

For both students and architectural designers, the physical model is a manifestation of ideas. The act of physical model-making is central to architectural education and our studios. It presents the opportunity to test, explore, speculate, compose and further the design process. How can you as students begin to challenge wasteful practice? Can we make our studio practice more circular?

Five teams of 4 L5 students each, drawn from each of the undergraduate degrees (Interiors, Architecture, AED, Technology) will participate in this design challenge for a week.

Monday 25 October 16.00 – 17.00 

The King’s Cross journey to carbon neutrality

Venue: Robin Evans Room (M416) and online; book at Eventbrite: https://www. eventbrite.co.uk/e/the-kings-cross-journey-to-carbon-neutrality-tickets-183433162527

Organiser and Moderator: Johannes Novy

Speaker: Stephen Kellett, Sustainability Manager, Ardent Services LLP

Discussant: Roudaina Alkhani

The King’s Cross Estate is one of Europe’s most significant regeneration projects – this talk will highlight the key decisions made from the projects inception through to the design of its buildings and the management in operation that have enabled it to achieve carbon neutrality, on its journey to net zero carbon.

Monday 25 October 17.30 – 18.30 

Opening of the ArCCAT Sustainable Design + Research Exhibition

Launch of the Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Campaign

Venue: Marylebone Learning Platform

Speaker: Peter Bonfield

Curators: Lindsay Bremner, Grace Lancto, François Girardin and David Scott, with the assistance of Chris Meloy and John Whitmore.

An exhibition of staff and student work from the School of Architecture and Cities supporting sustainability goals accompanied by the launch of a Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Campaign by the Fabrication Lab and the University’s Estates team.

Tuesday 26th October, 18.00 – 20.00 

Practicing Sustainability: from Portfolio to Practitioner

Venue: Robin Evans Room (M416) and online | to book tickets please go to Eventbrite: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/practicing-sustainability-from-portfolio-to-practitioner-tickets-191649176847

Organiser and Moderator: Harry Charrington

Speakers: Chris Morgan; John Gilbert Architects, Glasgow; Gordon O’Connor-Read; Rural Urban Synthesis Society and Laing O’Rourke.

How do you take the ideas and commitment of your student portfolio into architectural practice? How can you build a career that reinforces your ideals and aims, rather than compromises them? These two talks, by architects at very different stages of their careers will illustrate ‘how they do sustainable practice’, and the challenges and success they have had in addressing the concerns they had as students through their built projects.

Thursday 28th October, 18.00 – 20.00 

Environmental Design Sourcebook Book Launch and Panel Discussion

Venue: Room M416 and available on https://technicalstudies.tumblr.com/

Organisers: Will McLean and Pete Silver

To coincide with Climate Action Week and the recent publication of Environmental Design Sourcebook: Innovative Ideas for a Sustainable Built Environment (RIBA Publish- ing, 2021), the authors Will McLean and Pete Silver will host a book launch and panel discussion. The discussion will feature contributors from the publication including industry collaborators, and University of Westminster staff and student researchers: Kirsten Haggart (Waugh Thistleton), Rosa Schiano-Phan, Guy Sinclair, Urangua Sodnamjamts, Pete Silver and Will McLean.

This panel discussion about design for climate change is the first of a planned series exploring knowledge transfer networks and partnerships with industry. These discussions are hosted by the University of Westminster (on and off-site) and are supported by Dr Stephanie Lasalle from the Research and Knowledge Exchange Office.

For details contact Will McLean: w.f.mclean@westminster.ac.uk

SA+C & LFA: Thinking, Practising, Listening; Exploring Inclusion in Architecture | Monday, June 21, 2021 from 9:30 to 13:00 (BST)

This online symposium will focus on the importance to architectural practice and research of listening. To listen effectively is not just to hear: it means actively seeking perspectives from those people in society whose voices are often the least audible. In exploring a wide range of voices in architectural practice, theory and history, the symposium intersects with the themes of decolonisation and inclusion, which are embedded in the teaching and research culture of the University of Westminster.

The symposium will also focus on the role of universities in developing and promoting the practice of listening and will feature workshops and lightning presentations from students that explore reciprocal dialogue between teachers and learners within architectural education.

The keynote lecture will be delivered by Dr Huda Tayob, Senior Lecturer at the University of Cape Town. Her research focuses on migrant, minor and subaltern architectures, the politics of invisibility in space, and the potential of literature to respond to archival silences. She is co-curator of the open access curriculum Racespacearchitecture.org and the digital podcast series and exhibition Archive of Forgetfulness (archiveofforgetfulness.com).

Huda will be speaking on Transnational Architectures of Care, through her research on Somali malls in South Africa and the US.

09:30 Introduction and opening

Kate Jordan & Shahed Saleem

9.45 Session 1

Jane Tankard & Design Studio 3.1

A collaborative visual and verbal presentation emerging out of conversations with students over 7 years. The meetings were structured around speaking and listening to thoughts on pedagogy, studio, reciprocity and notions of home.

Christine Wall

How are architectural histories silenced? This question is explored with reference to two ongoing studies, one a 1970s architectural collaborative in London, and the other the Little Aden Cantonment, the 1960s extension of British colonial military accommodation which became the largest fully modular project in the world.

Tumpa Husna Fellows

Through her practice based research, Tumpa asks how can architecture amplify the voices of underrepresented communities to enable spatial justice and create social value in places, buildings and neighbourhoods? How can designing inclusive spaces help us respond to the climate injustice?

5 min break

11.15 Session 2

Maria Kramer

Leyton Community Hub; a description of the ongoing process of negotiating the complex mix of stakeholders in this project, from student engagement, public consultations & council requirements. How are these various needs and aspirations understood and managed through processes of listening and engaging?

Davide Deriu

‘Beautiful idea; beautiful building; beautiful materials…but I have problems with vertigo.’

Do practising architects listen to prospective users? How can different perceptions and experiences of space be accounted for? Drawing on his ongoing research on architecture and vertigo, this presentation shall discuss how embodied subjectivities are often neglected in the design process.

Through selected examples, this presentation will situate the issue of vertigo in relation to a broad understanding of spatial experience, and argue that a more inclusive approach might be developed through listening and care.

Elantha Evans & Design Studio 11

An introduction to an experimental research session to re-frame design studios with the empathic imagination in mind.

5 min break

12.15 Session 3

Introduction by Samir Pandya, Assistant Head, School of Architecture + Cities

Keynote

Huda Tayob, University of Cape Town

Transnational Architectures of Care

Conversation

Click here to register for the event via Eventbrite

Two new publications in Studio as Book Series edited by John Zhang and Elantha Evans.

The School of Architecture and Cities is pleased to announce the publication of two new books in the Studio as Book Series:  

No. 4 A Tale of Two Cities, JID Studio, 2015-2020, edited by John Zhang, 2020   

No. 5 Dialogues + Dreams, DS(2)01, 2015-2018,  edited by Elantha Evans, 2020  

The Studio as Book series was launched in 2016 to highlight the creative work undertake in what was then the Department of Architecture’s design studios.  It was intended to reflectively position the work of a design studio within wider intellectual, scientific or aesthetic debate and to provide a reference for future iterations of the studio. The series includes undergraduate and graduate work, and each book covers the work of a design studio over the course of at least two years. The books are produced thanks to the dedication of staff and students involved.  

Previous iterations of the series are: 

No.3 The Intrinsic and Extrinsic City, DS11, 2008-2017, edited by Andrew Peckham and Dusan Decermic, 2018  

No.2 Dialogical Designs, DS(3)03, 2012-2015, edited by Constance Lau, 2016   

No.1 Architecture, Energy Matter, DS18, 2013-2015, edited by Lindsay Bremner and Roberto Bottazzi, 2016    

For more about the series, go here: www.studioasbook.org  

Books are currently available to purchase on Amazon.co.uk or through the editor of each book, but will shortly be available as hard copies from Fabrication Laboratory shop.  

OPEN2017: The Future of Architecture _ Part 2/2

Hello and welcome to Part 2 of our report on OPEN2017.

Here we bring you some of the MArch RIBA Part II, Interior Design (BA Hons) and Architectural Technology (BSc Hons) students’ work, which had been on show in our Marylebone studios from June 15th until July 2nd.

 

MArch RIBA Part II

The MArch programme is underpinned by critical agendas, which through its studio culture, are explored as speculative realities. […] The evolving nature of the city, environmental intervention, digital craft, cinematic investigations of space, chance operations, spaces of conflict, industrial regeneration – these are just some of the themes explored by staff and students. (Darren Deane, Course Leader, OPEN2017 Catalogue)

 

DS10 lead by Toby Burgess and Arthur Mamou-Mani believes that architecture should be fun and is obsessed with giving the students an opportunity to build their own projects in the real world. The studio is focused is on physical experiments tested with digital tools for analysis, formal generation and fabrication. This year, students worked on three different briefs: From Symbols to Systems: Pavilion Proposal, Pavilion Construction and The Big Plan. The three briefs are 3 steps towards a creation of a pavilion for Burning Man 2017. This year’s field trip was to the utopian city of Auroville and the many temples of Hampi Valley.

 

DS11 lead by Andrew Peckham, Dusan Decermic and Elantha Evans, had chosen Budapest as the location and focus of their studio projects this year. This choice was directly related to an initial interest in the constitution of twin cities, where twinning as a theme might be understood at different scales: from a transnational context to that of the city itself, its urban districts and interiors. The studio developed three short study project themes, however the main Year One design project was Reconfiguring the Baths, and the Year Two design thesis associated with Architectures of Stasis and Flux. Both were introduced before the visiting Budapest and conducting a city survey.

 

DS12 lead by Ben Stringer, Peter Barber and Maria Kramer, focused on imagining and designing densely populated and ‘publicly owned’ city island villages in the Thames Estuary, a project that intersects issues of housing, industry, ecology and environment. A key issues that studio deals with is a severe shortage of housing in London and the construction of the Thames Tideway ‘super-sewer’, which will help bring new life to estuary ecology. Both were taken as catalysts for imagining new and better modes of existence and new ways of designing the cities. At the beginning of the second semester students went on a field trip to India, where they visited three big cities: Delhi, Ahmedabad and Mumbai.

 

DS13 lead by Andrew Yau and Andrei Martin operates as an applied think-tank, performing cultural analysis and design research. This year the studio focused on the role, relevance and political agency of architecture in contemporary cultural landscape defined by affect, mood, atmosphere and sensation. This was done through the context of Hong Kong’s urban transformation.

 

DS15 lead by Sean Griffiths, Kester Rattenbury and Ruby Ray Penny studies ‘chance’ as a design method via the transposition into architectural design of the American composer John Cage’s aleatoric techniques for musical composition. The studio’s approach encourages students to divest themselves of existing prejudices, tastes and preconceptions in the development of inventive design processes that challenge the underlying assumption that design is rational, linear and preordained activity predicated on intentionality.

 

 

DS16 lead by Anthony Boulanger, Stuart Piercy and Callum Perry returned from a sabbatical this year to continue to build on an ethos that challenges students to create experimental spatial design project that are informed by a critical response to social, cultural, political and economic contexts with an emphasis on an engagements with materials and an understanding of craft. The year began with an intense 5-week creative collaboration with the ceramics expert Jessie Lee at the Grymsdyke Farm. From there the investigation shifted to Porto, Portugal, which became a base for the main individual design project, where students conceived their own briefs and conducted their research.

 

DS18 lead by Lindsay Bremner and Roberto Botazzi has been participating in the research agenda of Monsoon Assemblages since 2016, a 5-year ERC funded project taking place in three cities in South Asia: Chennai, Dhaka and Delhi. These cities are places where neoliberal development is conspiring with changing monsoon patterns to produce floods, heatwaves, outbreaks of disease or water shortages and making urban life increasingly vulnerable.  In 2016/17 the studio began simulating monsoon rain as a way to develop its programme and aesthetics. The students visited Chennai where they were hosted by the School or Architecture and Planning at Anna University.

 

DS20 lead by Gabby Shawcross and Stephen Harty uses film to design and represent architecture. The aim of the studio is to explore animated relationships between architecture and occupants, simulate moving experiences of space, describe dynamic events and speculate on future scenarios. The year the students looked at motion in architecture and architecture in motion. They made journeys through space (quick direct routes and choreographed spatial sequences) in search of architecture that permits encounter and elicits delight.

 

DS21 lead by Clare Carter, Gill Lambert and Nick Wood is interested in edgelands. Working within a post-industrial landscape, the studio made a proposition for revitalising and re-imagining the town of Doncaster and its former mining colonies. The year began with a forensic study of the land, resulting in richly illustrated mappings, followed by production of artefacts which came as a result of working with the material culture of local communities. The major design project Doncaster Works had students speculating on the idea of a resurgent Doncaster, whether to make a new civic space, repurpose an existing structure or suggest a new industrial infrastructure for the town and its environs.

 

DS22 lead by Nasser Golzari and Yara Sharif aims to create a strong link between the practice, research and academia, so this year the studio continued ‘research by design’ journey across ‘absent’ and uncertain landscapes where time and mobility have become irrelevant. Looking at the Mediterranean sea as a prototype for hyper-connected and enduringly fragile world of present, leading to the edges of the Red Sea, Dead Sea and Persian gulf, the students tried to unpack the and expose the hidden layers and dynamic potential of coastal cities.

 

Light and Flight is a collaborative project between DS22, Palestine Regeneration Team (PART) and Golzari-NG Architects, in collaboration with Amos Trust. Exhibited at the OPEN2017, the project was also part of London Festival of Architecture (LFA). The installation celebrates notion of memory – this year’s theme at the LFA.

 

Interior Architecture (BA Hons)

Interior architecture is a distinct context-based practice concerned with re-reading, re-using and altering an architectural shell. Whether at the scale of the city, a building, or a room, the ‘interiorist’ always starts with something and within something. By altering those structures, Interior Architecture allows a building to have many different lives. London is our campus and projects this year included study spaces in the Victoria and Albert Museum, installations at Wilton’s Music Hall, live-work dwellings on Columbia Road and a broadcasting facility in Unity House, Woolwich. (Ro Spankie, Course Leader, OPEN2017 Catalogue)

 

Year 1: lead by Lara Rettondini (Module Leader), Sue Phillips, Yota Adilenidou, Allan Sylvester, Matt Haycocks

In the first year, students on the BA Interior Architecture course are introduced to underlying concepts and principles associated with the discipline and learn fundamental processes, skills and techniques relevant to conceive and develop, resolve and communicate spatial design proposals. They are also get to grips with the use of graphic design, CAD and 3D modelling software, as well as the Faculty’s Fabrication Lab. The projects undertaken over the course of the first year range from short-term tasks in semester one, followed by a study space design for researcher-in-residence at the Victoria and Albert Museum, to the interior design of a small building in semester two.

 

Year 2: lead by Matt Haycocks, Mike Guy, Mohamad Hafeda, Tania Lopez Winkler, Alessandro Ayuso (semester one includes: Julia Dwyer, Diony Kypraiou, Ro Spankie) 

This year the students were asked to look at two very different buildings: Wilton’s (a Victorian music hall in London’s East End) and Unity House (a marine engineering workshop on the banks of the Thames in Woolwich). Both studio projects were focused on the role of the existing building fabric in the process of regeneration, but also the role politics and the place play in interpreting the present and imagining the future. In semester one the students joint the third year students to work on the ideas related to domesticity and home, then worked on design proposals for the temporary inhabitation of Wilton’s Music Hall and finally in semester two they devised their own proposals for the adaptation and reuse of Unity House.

 

Year 3: lead by Ro Spankie, Alessandro Ayuso, Diony Kypraiou, Matt Haycocks (semester one includes: Julia Dwyer, Mike Guy, Mohamad Hafeda, Tania Lopez Winkler)

Third year students started this academic year working together with second year students on a joint project Home Acts. The aim was to explore an idea of home constructed through acts and rituals, rather than brick and mortar. Their own experience of home was then rehoused to a public realm, culminating into an installation and/or performance at Wilton’s Music Hall. The final Major Project in BA Architecture is self derived with students selecting their site and setting their programme.

 

Architectural Technology (BSc Hons)

Architectural Technology offers specialism in the technological, environmental, material and detailing decisions necessary to solve design problems. It requires sound understanding of design process, design and architectural composition, construction technology, and management tools for the effective communication of design information. (Virgina Rammou, Course Leader, OPEN2017 Catalogue)

This year, the second year students were asked to design a nursery school for 85 children and the third year students a new building for White Cube Galleries.

Year 2: lead by Adam Thwaites, Paul Kalkhoven, Tabatha Harris Mills, Virginia Rammou

Year 3: lead by Adam Thwaites, Paul Smith, Tabatha Harris Mills, Virginia Rammou

 

Make sure you like and follow our Instagram and Twitter pages, as we plan to reflect back on the OPEN2017 throughout the month of July.

Happy summer everyone!

OPEN2017: The Future of Architecture _ Part 1/2

This blurry shot through the window of our 5th floor studio captured the beginning of the long anticipated OPEN2017; the end to an intense and productive year, and for many the beginning of a new chapter, be it in their professional or academic lives.

Running as a part of London Festival of Architecture, the show opened on June 15th and closed on July 2nd.

Set up across the 4th and 5th floor of our studios in the heart of Marylebone, this year’s exhibition featured work from over 20 diploma studios, both Architecture (BA Hons) and Master of Architecture RIBA Part II (MArch), as well as works of students from Interior Architecture (BA Hons) and Architectural Technology (BSc Hons).

Here are some of the highlights from this year’s opening and the exhibition itself.

 

BA Architecture RIBA Part I

FIRST YEAR studio was divided into six groups (A, B, C, D, E and F). In the first semester they shared the same briefs, beginning with the Lightwall, an exercise in exploring the role of the wall in defining space and manipulating the quality of light. The second brief focused on developing surveying, analysis, drawing and model building skills. The final brief of the term was W.A.Gs. (WikiHouse and Games). In the second semester each group worked on a separate brief, and the themes varied from ‘House for the Apocalypse’, ‘Sculptor Studio and Flat’ and ‘Deptford (art) Market’, to ‘Gallery of the Future’.

 

SECOND YEAR students developed their projects on sites across London; from New River and Peckham Coal Line, to Old Street, Whitechapel and all the way to Highgate in North London.

DS2.1 lead by Elantha Evans and Anthony Povis started the year by exploring the course of the ‘New River’, constructed to bring fresh water into central London from Hertfordshire. The study visit to Madrid, Chinchon, Avila and Toledo in Spain paid particular attention to the ways in which institutional building sits within urban fabric, how it affects public and private space and what presence – literal and symbolic – does it have in the city.

Domestic Sanctuary / everyday moments: semester one brief required a development of a ‘social hub’ on one of the three sites, each having a particular relationship to the New River and linking in with the existing health facilities.

Civic Sanctuary / everyday asylum: semester two proposals for ‘civic cog’ were made on a choice of two liminal sites: one in the former peripheral ‘village’ of Stoke Newington, and the other on a layered, historic site near Aldgate, located next to the former London Wall.

 

DS2.2 lead by Natalie Newey and John Zhang, went back to Peckham this year; where the broad mix of people and built environment provide rich territory to explore the studio’s interest in how design is informed by a meaningful engagement with local communities. The briefs were developed around the relationships which the studio had cultivated with the Coal Line project and local community groups, including John Donne, a local primary school.

A trip to Ahmedabad, India in January was a highlight of the year, organised around a workshop with students at CEPT University. The students investigated local community projects, analysed through sketches local landmark buildings, and explored the urban fabric of this ancient city.

 

DS2.3 lead by Shahed Saleem and Michael Rose focused on the term ‘Interculturalism’ and the question of what kind of architecture is required for an intercultural city. Through their design projects students explored what an intercultural space is and what kind of cultural encounter does it encourage; what sort of contact and relationships can architecture instigate between diverse people and what does meaningful contact mean.

 

DS2.4 lead by Julian Williams and Maria Kramer discussed what it means to live and learn outside, to explore landscape as cultural artefact, an educational resource, and in architectural dimensions. The students tried out Bharat Cornell’s exercises for sharing nature with children, drew the woodland canopy and went on to design two projects for the emerging Forest School movement.

Nature Nook: For St Michael’s School in Highgate, the students examined the funding problems confronting the maintenance of school grounds, and the factors limiting outdoor playing and learning.

Queen’s Wood Retreat: the designs to transform a brownfield site adjacent to Queen’s Wood Highgate into a centre for Forest School practice were developed through discussions and communication with the expert allotment growers, Forest School practitioners and school teachers.

 

DS2.5 lead by Camilla Wilkinson and Emma Perkin took the programme for Polyark 4: Fun Palace Futures, as an opportunity for students to make connections between the brief – communication of scientific research – and the process of experimentation in architectural design.

Indoor Weather: A pavilion for Imperial Festival – a temporary pavilion housing a weather condition that enables scientists to engage the public in their area of scientific research.

Laboratory of Fun, Hackney Wick: A laboratory that spawns ancillary spaces for public use or laboratories that transform into public space.

In May this year, DS2.5 students were invited to exhibit their semester one project ‘Indoor Weather’ at the Imperial College Science Festival, at Imperial Festival 2017, and here are just a few highlights from that weekend, where the pavilion eventually exhibited at the OPEN2017 was first assembled.

 

DS2.6 lead by Stefania Boccaletti and Fiona Zisch set out to investigate how agriculture can be inserted into highly urbanised areas as a small-scale resource-saving systems. In the process of developing their designs, students queried both how urban agriculture has been transforming through the integration of new technologies and how to combine the myriad architectural requirements (e.g. responsive systems linking user and building, environment and building, and user and environment) with the needs, ambitions, and practicalities of 21st century food production.

 

THIRD YEAR studios tackled the political, material and social dimensions of architecture.

DS3.1 lead by Jane Tankard and Alicia Pivaro, believe that anarchy or self-determination has the potential to be central to architectural design and production. Addressing the role of the architect and the representation of modernist ideology in film, the students examined the dichotomy of a utopian ideal versus everyday life. Using the ‘Highgate Bowl’ in North London as their site, the studio delved into local utopias – past and present – to unravel narratives and histories, which would inform individual programmes for a landscape and museum/intervention.

 

DS3.2 lead by Giles Smith and Anthony Engi Meacock took their interest in architecture and economics to the English seaside. This year the studio chose Margate as their site in order to explore the relationship between the coastal capital and coastal culture, and the distinctive architecture they both generate. Working from a highly situated reading of the town, the students developed their projects to question the current policy of culturally-led redevelopment. These propose a series of new models of (creative) industries, ranging from housing for old-age entrepreneurs through to a basketball academy for Margate’s disenfranchised youth.

 

DS3.3 lead by Constance Lau and Alison McLellan, explored Umberto Eco’s idea of the capacity for user intervention to shape the reading of the work, a concept also demonstrated in Walter Benjamin’s The Arcades Project, described as a “blueprint for an unimaginably massive and Labyrinthine architecture”. These ideas inform the studio’s interest in multiple interpretations, and especially the search outside architecture to inspire architectural design. The semester one project Building the Arnolfini was focused on exploring the complex use of signifiers and perspective views of Jan van Eyck through the notion of an architectural montage, where different readings radiate from singular source. This was furthered in semester two’s Artefice and Artefact project, which had lead to a proposal for a new museum typology to address the ensuing shifts in the current disparate landscape of the British Museum’s chronologically, geographically and culturally displaced items.

 

DS3.4 lead by Elly Ward and Johnny Fisher is interested in cultural identity, British-ness and popular contemporary culture. In June 2016, the UK voted to detach both physically and philosophically from the EU with no clear idea how this island nation would continue to operate without collaboration with our European counterparts. In response to this lack of manifesto, DS3.4 has spent a year speculating on how the future of British architecture might look in a post-Brexit Britain. The students explored the concept of A Nation at Sea, the Edge Condition, and how statements such as ‘Taking Back Control’ and ‘Making Britain Great Again’ impact our debate and our cultural frame of reference.

 

DS3.5 lead by Bruce Irwin and Catherine Phillips, investigated two London sites on the Grand Union Canal – in Camden Town at Castlehaven Road and at Corbridge Crescent adjacent to Mare Street and Cambridge Heath Road. The studio is interested in the relationship between urban form, material memory and public space. London development favours a blank slate, a site cleared of all trace of prior occupation, so the question this studio is concerned with is what happens when city loses what it physically was. Is there an alternative?

 

DS3.6 lead by Harry Paticas and Tom Raymont began this academic year in Epping Forest and ended it in the woods of Punkaharju, Finland. Along the way students discovered the forest as complex ecosystem, a regenerative source of building material and a repository of cultural, mythical, and design narratives. In semester one students proposed and intervention into the woodland at The Sustainability Centre in Hampshire that enhanced the habitat for one particular species as well as bringing human beings into closer, more mutualistic relationship with that animal. In semester two students returned to London and turned their Naturalists lenses on to the Doon Street car park site behind the National Theatre. The year ended with a 9-day workshop in Punkaharju Forests of Finland, where the students collectively designed and built a timber shelter with architect Sami Rintala. (read more about the trip here)

 

DS3.7 lead by John Zhang and David Porter, is a joint studio with the Central Academy of Fine Arts in Beijing (CAFA), and it uses Beijing and London as its test beds. The studio seeks to explore how diverse communities of citizens can live together. In semester one students were based in Beijing for a two-month long exchange programme at CAFA, before moving to an ex-industrial site in Fengtai, Beijing. Their experiences and lessons learnt from Beijing were carried over to London and consolidated in semester two through a development of a comprehensive architectural proposal for hybrid housing scheme in Bermondsey.

 

The second part of our report on the OPEN2017, which will featured more info on MArch RIBA Part II, Interior Architecture (BA Hons) and Architectural Technology (BSc Hons) soon to follow.

In the meantime, make sure you visit our Instagram page where the OPEN2017 had been chronicled since the opening night.